Seeing a screen
and a slide projector set up in Room 510 is unusual for Poetry Forum gatherings
at The New School, but we had artist Trevor Winkfield to visit Tuesday night,
and of course, seeing the work is its best introduction. John Ashbery says,
paraphrasing Walter Pater, “If all art aspires toward the condition of music as
Pater wrote, Trevor Winkfield must be counted among the most successful artists
of all time.” (Check out Trevor’s website here. )
An attitude of
precise methodical whimsy pervades his work, and it was especially illuminating
to listen to a painter who is also a writer who has collaborated with
poets. In his introduction, New School poetry coordinator David
Lehman (above, right, with Winkfield, left) explained that he and colleagues believe in the inter-dependency of the
arts, and that if you’re looking for inspiration, “It makes as much sense to
expose yourself to painting as to poetry.”
Trevor Winkfield
has collaborated with Ashbery, John Yau and Ron Padgett among others. Exact
Change Books recently re-published the Winkfield's translation of Raymond
Roussel’s How I Wrote Certain of My Works. Winkfield has collected his
writings in In the Scissors’ Courtyard and his art in Pageant.
At the beginning
of his talk, Trevor tackled exactly that: How to begin. The problem -- “Where
to
Pierrot and Harlequin, Winkfield, 2006
place the first mark on a canvas, and what it should represent” – is a problem for poets as well. The speaker also noted the special blessing (which doubles as a challenge) for artists and poets – unlike ballerinas, they have or can have life-long careers. That’s the blessing. The challenge is how to keep developing and coming up with fresh ideas. He made the comparison to Scheherazade, who, in the Arabian Nights, is constantly in mortal danger if her powers of invention fail her. Winkfield warned against what he called the Marc Chagall effect -- the endless repetition of motifs from the start of one’s career. The room tittered at that -- it’s always fun to poke fun at one of the "big names."
Born in 1944, Winkfield
recollected his childhood in Leeds, England,
which was still in the grip of austerity after the war. No T.V., long
walks as one of the chief recreations, miserable weather (“bone-chilling
cold”), and gas lamps: “The calendar might read 1950, but it felt more like
1910.” The scarcity of paper “made one careful of what marks you put on it.” So
his artwork turned toward the fastidious, and toward graphic design.
From early on, he felt unwilling to accept
the world as given. There are, he said, two sorts of people, “those who accept
the world , and those -- I think there are many in this room -- who create a
world.”
When he was
eleven, he discovered heraldry and was fascinated by its intricacy, and how the
arcane designs were full of meanings and seemed to be composed of a “secret
language.” it was his first exposure to poetry -- a way to describe the world that wasn’t purely pedestrian.
Then came a time
when he was dissatisfied with his work. He left art college in 1967 and became
a writer. In 1976 -- he had emigrated to the States by this time -- he went to
a Richard Tuttle exhibit and felt re-invigorated. He soon began working in acrylics,
enjoying the flatness they provided as well as the intense color. Trevor said
that these first art works were small enough to fit in his suitcase. Also, he
noted that until quite recently, English art tended to the smaller while
American art tended toward the large -- a function of the different landscapes,
perhaps. (“English painting is an art of comment; American painting is an art
of statement.”)
The English landscape after thousands of years of intense
human habitation has a more comfortable feeling, even cozy. The American landscape
is large “Once you get out of the cities, it’s quite overwhelming.”
Drawing on the
style of heraldic art, and the intense colors he saw in medieval stained glass
in York Cathedral, near where he grew up, Winkfield began to imagine his own
art. Most of the artwork he had been exposed to was in the form of small
reproductions -- postcards and the like. “My ambition (became) to give painting
the feel of reproductions, so that it will appear as real in life as in
magazines.”
Trevor said that it can take him quite a
while to complete a piece. He starts with some image that he reproduces on
paper, then he cuts that out and places it on the eventual canvas. Once he has
one image, others tend to flow from that: “The first image calls forth the second,
and so forth.
“Not every
object means something. Just as with
writing: individual words don’t have meanings, sentences do.”
As Moths to the Flame, Winkfied, 2007
David asked
Trevor how he meets the challenge of re-inventing himself.
“It occurs
after I’ve had a show. It's a fatal mistake not to exhibit, despite the horror
of exhibiting.” He explained that when he sees his work all gathered together
he can see something he’d like to change or improve or new ideas that he’d like
to explore. David likened the publication of a book by a poet to an exhibition
– and also noted that the deadline pressure often gets you to finish projects.
-- Meg McGuire
What a lovely piece on what sounds a really, really cool event. Thanks.
Posted by: John Emil Vincent | February 27, 2009 at 01:25 PM
I am trying to contact Meg Mcguire. I am old friend whom she met in Oneonta, NY many years ago. Can you help?
Posted by: Charlie Clausen | August 08, 2009 at 04:31 PM