POV . . . LOP
Enlarged detail and inset painting: Marie Joséphine Charlotte du Val d'Ognes, Marie Denise Villers, 1801, gallery 629.
In my corporate days, I lived with many a LOP, a list of open points. This fine work, always considered exceptional, has one serious LOP.
- Artist: First attributed to Jacques-Louis David, it was then assigned to Marie Denise Villers, Constance Marie Charpentier, Marie du Val d’Ognes (self-portrait of the sitter), or even her sister.
- Scene: Whoever made the portrait depicts a woman in one of the studios available in the Louvre to qualified artists. Professional women . . . with private lives . . . in radical outfits? Much is proposed, little is certain.
- Details: The broken window pane can be read as a subtle reference to the chaos and violence of the French revolution. The pink of her ribbon was “the color” of 1801.
- Technique: “Perspective is represented by sight lines that cross through matter. Is this why the pane of glass is broken in the Met portrait? Are perspective rays powerful enough to break glass?” - Anne Higonnet “Through a Louvre Window,” Journal18, 2016.
But Montaigne would say, “The soul which has no established viewpoint gets lost; for, as they say, he who is everywhere, is nowhere.”
Three Knaves and a Diversion
Top:The Fortune-Teller, Georges de La Tour, 1630s, gallery 634.
Bottom left: The Cardsharps, Caravaggio, 1595, Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas.
Bottom right: The Cheat with the Ace of Clubs, Georges de La Tour, 1630s, Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas.
Quatremère de Quincy coined the term petit genre in 1792 . . . and ranked landscape painting at the bottom, because observation from nature supposedly required little imagination. At the top were grande genre (history paintings), because history required a great deal of imagination. Petit genre (ordinary people in common activities) was in the middle, requiring only some imagination. And of course they were priced and sized for the new bourgeois collectors.
The card playing scenes are a mix of diversion and isolation. Modern criticism sees the minimal eye contact of the subjects “as aloneness”. Other readings are possible.
The Caravaggio could be titled Maesh, Louie and Babe, after my great uncles. Once, after taking my 10-year-old cousins’ allowance money in crazy eights, Uncle Maesh (a Chicago mob lawyer in the 1920s-30s) advised, “don't bet more than you can afford to lose, and never play cards with strangers”. I asked Uncle Babe (day manager at Caesar’s Palace) why they had Evil Knievel jump the casino fountain. “There will be an extra million dollars of private bets - how many bones he will break, will his bike catch on fire . . . and half of those betting will be ‘ahead’ at our door. That money will not leave the property.” Uncle Louie (a bail bondsman and pawn shop owner) had a standard greeting: “You got two tens for a five and I’ll owe you five?”
These petit genre paintings feel like a reunion . . . familial slights of hand. I am retroactively surprised that Aunt Edna, who re-knitted my favorite sweater out of the same yarn each year as I grew, did not take up fortune telling. She would have been great. My favorite detail is the glove, “the fingertips exposed, the better to feel marked cards” (MetText) which I'm sure Edna would have re-sized as needed.
Madonna of the Plaga Magna
Top: Madonna and Child with Saints, Giovanni Bellini, c. 1510, not on view.
Bottom left: Madonna della Misericordia, Simone Martini and Lippo Memmi, 1308-10, Pinacoteca, Siena.
Bottom center: Madonna and Child with Saints Francis and Clare, Cima da Conegliano, 1510, not on view.
Bottom right: Madonna della Misericordia, Piero della Francesca, 1460–1462, Pinacoteca Comunale, Sansepolcro.
Of all the Madonna taxonomies, and there a lot, I only knew a few, like Our Lady of the Flowers and the Madonna of the Rocks. There are many categories, such as religious purpose (humility, misery, childbirth) and place (garden, stairs), but my favorite remains “of the___” (quail, cherries, harpies).
I found no compositional categories. Both the Bellini and the Cima (and many others) have these wonderful centered stripes. They are found in the purpose category of “sacred conversations” (Mary “interacting” with assorted saints). Why not call it what it is?
The big stripe behind the Madonna is a cloth of honor, derived from the Baldachin (a pattern from Bagdad), resembling the thrones which were common in sacred conversations. The cloth creates a boundary line between the sacred space and the profane landscape. Its Byzantine effect takes a path away from Florentine perspective toward a very abstract spacial plane.
If I could add a category it would be the Madonna of the Plaga Magna - L. Big Stripe. It would include the Misericordia Madonnas, in which an oversized Mary not only defines the sacred space, but she herself is the big stripe.
Catchlights and Cropped Skulls
Top left: Virgin and Child with Saint Anne. Top right: detail, Albrecht Dürer, 1519, gallery 640.
Center right: Merle Oberon in Hitchcock’s The Lodger, 1944.
Bottom right: Carpenter, Vincent van Gogh, 1880, Rijksmuseum KrollerMuller, Otterio.
Bottom center: Cropped skull drawing lessons, Betty Edwards, The New Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain, 1999.
Bottom left: Elizabeth Taylor, Montgomery Clift, A Place in the Sun, 1951.
The catchlight used in film/photography goes way back; we see it as early as Dürer. Those tiny reflections that bring life to the eye. “Saint Anne’s eyes show Dürer’s typical placement of catchlights opposite a minute, crisp reflection along the inner rim of the iris.” - MetText. After Merle Oberon’s car accident, cinematographer Lucian Ballard hid his wife’s scars by slightly washing them out with a small lamp - dubbed an “Obie” after Oberon. The lamp, so close to the axis of the lens, created a catchlight in Oberon’s eyes.
Betty Edwards found a systematic drawing error in her students; they consistently reduced the size of the forehead. Even when pointed out, they had difficulty “seeing” it. Van Gogh had the same issue in his early drawings. He was self-taught but observant enough to identify and correct the error. The perception that the forehead doesn't have enough information to be valuable somehow suggests the use of skull cropping in the close up. Remove the forehead if it’s a blank slate.
“. . . no one can do what he really wants in the beginning.” (January 1873). “I am trying now to exaggerate the essential, and purposely leave the obvious things vague.” (May 1888). - Vincent van Gogh.
Wonderful post. Thank you. -- DL
Posted by: The Best American Poetry | June 24, 2020 at 02:53 PM