I met Huang by chance… In the line, quite by chance, Huang was… By chance, I met Huang in the line… to see Noé Soulier’s Passages at the Conciergerie on the île de la Cité… Passages was part of the Atelier de Paris’ brave post-lockdown Indispensable ! performances program concentrate.
Huang had a good place in line, so, full of bluff and bonhomie (thus fobbing off challenges to my cutting the line), I slithered in next to him. While we, as always, talked excitedly about the performance, underneath I was actually excited by the prospect of going inside the Conciergerie.
Until the Passages performance, I had only been able to cast my eyes through high grimy windows onto the Conciergerie’s vast sunken hall. I thought that it surely is true Gothic. Spiritual, you know. Though I told Huang it was about primeval forests and barbarian cultural memory, not something so damned woolly. I wouldn’t want him getting the wrong idea about me.
Even through dirty windows, I have to say, the profane eye travels up the plain squat stone pillars, rides the surge of arcing groins into the shadow of vaults high above. The eye rests there, surprised, as if by sudden light, startled into mind. Indeed, before it became Marie Antoinette’s death cell and a tourist attraction, the Conciergerie had once been the throne room of Clovis I, King of All Franks, a German tribe that pretty much ran this corner of northern Europe at the time.
Spirituality and history. Rejecting the Arian god-man theory of Jesus’ divinity, Clovis I subscribed the three-spirits-same-flesh or Trinitarian theory, thus ensuring a 1000-year primacy for the misguided theories of language of Augustine of Hippo, doctor of Christianity. I blame Augustine and subsequent Christian poohbahs for sanctioning the cruel habit of making reality from words : De Do Do Do, De Da Da Da. Augustine, not that sweet old Romantic Goethe, is responsible for “Those-are-not-bombs,-honey” Goebbels.
I expected Noé Soulier’s Passages would in some way flesh out the history and architecture of the Conciergerie, illuminate my mind’s eye with some unbid aspect of the place. Instead of Clovis or Augustine or the Police, Yasmine Hugonnet came to mind.
As good in her way as Sting, Hugonnet is a dancer and choreographer whose work I’ll have the pleasure to see at Atelier de Paris in October, and have seen at Regard du Cygne and Lafayette Anticipations – very different contexts.
Hugonnet calls her performance troupe Arts Mouvementés, thinking of how, as her web site has it, “form, image and sensation intertwine, how the imagination, becomes …” and how “the process of incarnation and appropriation” works through and how to get these things into or out of choreography.
Beyond negotiating the twists and turns of choreographic culture and heritage to intertwine, incarnate and appropriate into a given performance, it seems to me that Hugonnet’s insight is that “dance” is definitively not, of course, about contextual bumping, grinding and flinging out the arms, however delicately, classically or expressively, but about movement. And in this, she – along with a lot of her sisters and brothers in dance – is going a bit farther than Isadora Duncan’s Dance-as-(sacred, human)-art, understanding it more as an access of universal primal force, quite beyond the first-take “shaking-up” sense of mouvementé to something more like prime mover, moving, moved, becoming, happening.
Those kids down on the corner, spinning on their hips, flipping over, fast as lightning, talking loud and completely unconscious that the nervous old white lady is calling the police on? They aren’t just having fun, they are doing truth in a quantum universe, a universe that exists because it moves. I hope the police don’t gas and whack ‘em too hard before the world changes cameras.
So, I think, as I wait on a bench in a medieval forest of stone pillars sculpted of yellow half-light, however Huang might experience the esthetics of Noé Soulier’s choreography or however I might myself experience watching this, being here with Huang and other dance-friends and strangers, all will, must, involve movement.
What’s important to performance is not how or to what end but the fact of movement. Soulier’s very fine troupe chase around plain stone pillars, Clovis’ ghost clanks in the torch-yellowed light shadows, my eye roves for mystery.
As I come out of the Conciergerie into the suffocating evening heat of what used to be early Fall and offer to walk a little way with Huang, I understand that “movement” is the core value of “Dance”. So the “art of Dance” is also “art of movement”. The “art” being what I hope Hugonnet (and Isadora Duncan) will forgive me for rhetorically shaping as the act and representation of the “intertwining of form, image, sensation, imagination, incarnation and appropriation into and out of choreography”.
Comments