from "How Well Do You Know Your Hitchcock? A Multiple-Choice Test for the Maestro’s Fans"
By David Lehman | January 19, 2024 / in The American Scholar
<<< Though he never won the Oscar for Best Director in his lifetime, Alfred Hitchcock enjoys an enviable posthumous existence. He may be the most revered of all film directors today. He is my own favorite. Time was, critics condescended to Hitchcock on the grounds that his movies were merely thrillers, and thus either less important or less serious than blockbusters like Ben Hur or message movies like To Kill A Mockingbird. But Hitchcock always used mystery genre conventions to explore themes of deeper significance; he relied on what he called “the MacGuffin,” the merest pretext, as the pivot for a plot involving crime or espionage and ultimately touching on the dialectic of guilt and innocence, good and evil.
Hitchcock was born in London on August 13, 1899 (and when the 13th of August falls on a Friday, freaky things do happen). He made films for nearly two decades in Britain before moving to Hollywood in 1939, on the eve of World War II. His love for his adopted country shines through in some of his grand settings: the cliffhanger scenes at the Statue of Liberty (Saboteur, 1942) and at Mount Rushmore (North by Northwest, 1959), or the drowning scene near the Golden Gate Bridge (Vertigo, 1958). But we also have small-town America at its most innocent (Shadow of a Doubt, 1943), the intimate courtyard shared by Greenwich Village bohemians (Rear Window, 1954), a posh London flat (Dial M for Murder, 1954), and a lonely motel on a dark country road in the rain (Psycho, 1960).
He was prolific; he headlined Cary Grant, James Stewart, Gregory Peck, and a bouquet of beauteous and talented blondes, including Ingrid Bergman, Grace Kelly, Doris Day, Kim Novak, Janet Leigh, and Eva Marie Saint. Understanding his own singularity, Hitchcock signed his pictures with himself in a cameo. He might be the fellow sitting next to Cary Grant on the bus (To Catch a Thief, 1955), a musician carrying a violin case (Spellbound, 1945), or a passenger struggling with a double bass (Strangers on a Train, 1951). In Lifeboat (1944), in which all the action takes place on a small craft and is limited to the few survivors of a shipwreck, the master makes his appearance as the heavyset fellow in a newspaper ad for weight reduction.
I have named eleven of my favorite Hitchcock movies in this piece and yet have not even mentioned Notorious (1946) or The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956), about either of which I would write a prose poem. That’s for later. For now, here’s a quiz I’ve devised that will appeal to aficionados or newcomers alike. Hover your cursor over the black box (or tap, on mobile) to reveal the answer.
1. In The Man Who Knew Too Much, who—or what—is Ambrose Chapel?
(A) Albert Hall’s younger brother
(B) The kidnapper
(C) A London church
(E) The “MacGuffin”
(E) A taxidermist
Answer: (C) a London church in the 1956 version of The Man Who Knew Too Much—but metaphorically, it is also (A) an anticipation of the film’s climactic scene at the Royal Albert Hall. Like Albert Hall, Ambrose Chapel is a name that can be taken to refer to a person, the way Dr. Benjamin McKenna (James Stewart) and his wife, the celebrated singer Josephine Conway (Doris Day), interpret it at first. (E) is the very epitome of a red herring, the completely innocent namesake Dr. McKenna tracks down. While (B) is incorrect, it is at least relevant, because the kidnapper is Ambrose Chapel’s main man of the cloth. As for (D), you know what a MacGuffin is, don’t you? Well, here’s Hitchcock’s explanation: “It might be a Scottish name, taken from a story about two men on a train. One man says, ‘What’s that package up there in the baggage rack?’ And the other answers, ‘Oh, that’s a MacGuffin.’ The first one asks, ‘What’s a MacGuffin?’ ‘Well,’ the other man says, ‘it’s an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highlands.’ The first man says, ‘But there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands,’ and the other one answers, ‘Well then, that’s no MacGuffin!’ So you see that a MacGuffin is actually nothing at all.”
For more of this multiple choice quiz designed to delight aficionado and novice alike, click here for the full article on the website of The American Scholar.
The conversation between Marion and Norman in the motel parlor is the greatest - and the acting is superb. Yes, we all go a little crazy sometime. Bravo Hitchcock.
Posted by: Emily Fragos | January 20, 2024 at 09:53 PM
I misquoted the famous line. It is, "We all go a little mad sometimes."
Posted by: Emily Fragos | January 20, 2024 at 10:02 PM
Hitch NOTORIOUS-ly had conflicts with the beautiful actresses he could hire but not have. One of my favorite stories concerns Grace Kelly in TO CATCH A THIEF. For the famous ball-gown scene, Grace arrived on set in a lavish, moderately low-cut gold dress. Hitch stared at her breasts and said, "Why, Grace, there's hills in them thar gold." I always wondered if that was a spontaneous remark or if he'd scripted it and was lying in wait. He scripted everything. Maybe we forgive Hitch's sexism not only because he was a genius, but because whatever his personal frustrations were, he filmed women in magnificent Technicolor glory, as opposed to the other reigning obsession of that decade: men facing each other down over poker tables or quick-draw contests. Or the worst: saluting each other with tears in their eyes. Boring.
Posted by: jim c | January 21, 2024 at 09:10 AM
Thanks for the comments. Whatever they say about Hitch, I consider all his movies, -- well, nearly all --- as valentines to the beautiful talented and gracious actresses on center stage. His villains are great, too. The only leading men worthy of these ladies are Cary Grant, James Stewart, and Gregory Peck. Think of "Strangers on a Train," where Bruno Anthony (Robert Walker) is far more interesting than the tennis player hero (Farley Granger).I can never quite take Farley Granger seriously.
Posted by: David Lehman | January 21, 2024 at 09:45 PM
I missed way too many of these...but then, I haven't seen them in 35 years. It may be time to revisit them.
Posted by: Michael C. Rush | January 22, 2024 at 03:30 PM
Id forgotten just how good the Hitchcock movies are; they definitely pass the test of time unlike so many movies of today.
Posted by: Amy Donow | January 29, 2024 at 08:57 AM
Thank you, Amy, and you Michael.
Posted by: David Lehman | January 29, 2024 at 11:26 AM