Yesterday marked the 106th birthday of Ern Malley, who remains one of Australia’s most internationally renowned poets and our greatest ever literary hoax. After I disclosed that I'm Australian in our first ever email exchange, David immediately wanted to know where I stood on the whole Malley affair. While the hoax overall has legions of fans, many people feel that the poems themselves cannot possibly possess any quality due to the nature of their genesis. In his review of The Complete Poems of Ern Malley published in Jacket in 2002, David offers a comprehensive introduction to Ern’s formative years and a lucid and insightful commentary on his poetry, arguing that Ern’s oeuvre has merit beyond the hoax, no matter the dubious motivations behind the poems’ creation. You can read David’s review here. Happy birthday Ern!
The Ern Malley Poetry Hoax by David Lehman
The greatest literary hoax of the twentieth century was concocted by a couple of Australian soldiers at their desks in the offices of the Victoria Barracks in Melbourne, land headquarters of the Australian army, on a quiet Saturday in October 1943. The uniformed noncombatants, Lieutenant James McAuley and Corporal Harold Stewart, were a pair of Sydney poets with a shared animus toward modern poetry in general and a particular hatred of the surrealist stuff championed by Adelaide wunderkind Max Harris, the twenty-two-year-old editor of Angry Penguins, a well-heeled journal devoted to the spread of modernism down under.
In a single rollicking afternoon McAuley and Stewart cooked up the collected works of Ernest Lalor Malley. Imitating the modern poets they most despised (‘not Max Harris in particular, but the whole literary fashion as we knew it from the works of Dylan Thomas, Henry Treece, and others’), they rapidly wrote the sixteen poems that constitute Ern Malley’s ‘tragic lifework.’ They lifted lines at random from the books and papers on their desks (Shakespeare, a dictionary of quotations, an American report on the breeding grounds of mosquitoes, etc.). They mixed in false allusions and misquotations, dropped ‘confused and inconsistent hints at a meaning’ in place of a coherent theme, and deliberately produced what they thought was bad verse. They called their creation Malley because mal in French means bad. He was Ernest because they were not.
Later, the hoaxers added a high-sounding ‘preface and statement,’ outfitted Malley with a tearjerking biography, and created his suburban sister Ethel. The invention of Ethel was a masterstroke. It was she who sent Malley’s posthumous opus, ‘The Darkening Ecliptic’, to Max Harris along with a cover letter tinged with her disapproval of her brother’s bohemian ways and proclaiming her own ignorance of poetry."
Here is "Petit Testament." A misprint altered the last line from "I have split the infinitive" to "I have split the infinite." I vote for the former.
Petit Testament
In the twenty-fifth year of my age
I find myself to be a dromedary
That has run short of water between
One oasis and the next mirage
And having despaired of ever
Making my obsessions intelligible
I am content at last to be
The sole clerk of my metamorphoses.
Begin here:
In the year 1943
I resigned to the living all collateral images
Reserving to myself a man’s
Inalienable right to be sad
At his own funeral.
(Here the peacock blinks the eyes
of his multipennate tail.)
In the same year
I said to my love (who is living)
Dear we shall never be that verb
Perched on the sole Arabian Tree
Not having learnt in our green age to forget
The sins that flow between the hands and feet
(Here the Tree weeps gum tears
Which are also real: I tell you
These things are real)
So I forced a parting
Scrubbing my few dingy words to brightness.
Where I have lived
The bed-bug sleeps in the seam, the cockroach
Inhabits the crack and the careful spider
Spins his aphorisms in the comer.
I have heard them shout in the streets
The chiliasms of the Socialist Reich
And in the magazines I have read
The Popular Front-to-Back.
But where I have lived
Spain weeps in the gutters of Footscray
Guernica is the ticking of the clock
The nightmare has become real, not as belief
But in the scrub-typhus of Mubo.
It is something to be at last speaking
Though in this No-Man’s-language appropriate
Only to No-Man’s-Land.
Set this down too:
I have pursued rhyme, image, and metre,
Known all the clefts in which the foot may stick,
Stumbled often, stammered,
But in time the fading voice grows wise
And seizing the co-ordinates of all existence
Traces the inevitable graph
And in conclusion:
There is a moment when the pelvis
Explodes like a grenade. I
Who have lived in the shadow that each act
Casts on the next act now emerge
As loyal as the thistle that in session
Puffs its full seed upon the indicative air.
I have split the infinitive. Beyond is anything.
That Messrs McAuley and Stewart could have concocted 16 poems [hoax or not] over the course of a Saturday shows that something quite extraordinary was happening in their joint imagination. The very intensity that must have been present at Victoria Barracks that day. Were they ever as creative? Certainly McAuley wrote poetry that is still anthologised, ranging from his early enjoyable satiric mode to formal, serious religious works of a conservative Roman Catholic convert, though his Collected Poems is now I believe well out of print. Ern of course continues to be at the least anthologised and so he should be.
Of course the poet and poets that continue to come to mind re McAuley/Stewart/Malley is Fernando Pessoa and his extraordinary heteronyms: Senhors Caeiro, de Campos, and Reis. One wonders what McAuley and Stewart would have made of both him and them.
Posted by: ALAN WEARNE | March 16, 2024 at 04:53 AM
Completely agree with Alan Wearne, who knows whereof he speaks.
Posted by: Ralph Nightingale | March 16, 2024 at 05:21 PM
I always thought Ern Malley was real.
Posted by: Gerritt Cole Porter | March 16, 2024 at 07:03 PM
Gerrit Cole Porter: you never did!!!! Btw, how's your arm?
Posted by: Reds Skelton | March 16, 2024 at 09:30 PM
I bid a farewell to arms, said Venus.
Posted by: Gerritt Cole Porter | March 17, 2024 at 01:23 PM
Infinitive, I think.
Posted by: Bruce Kawin | March 20, 2024 at 02:02 PM
I agree with you, Bruce.
Posted by: David Lehman | March 21, 2024 at 03:53 PM
Hoaxter, joaxster, poem in the toaster!
Posted by: Humpty Trumper | March 22, 2024 at 05:12 PM