The New York School Diaspora (Part Eighty-Six): Billy Collins [by Angela Ball]

In Praise of Ignorance

On a bench one afternoon
in a grassy park in Minneapolis,
I realized that what I liked best
about the dogs of Minneapolis
is they have no idea they’re in Minneapolis.

The same could be said
of the dogs of Houston or Philadelphia,
it occurred to me on the slow walk
back to my hotel, but I was
in no mood to be distracted.

I’m sticking with the dogs of Minneapolis,
I resolved as the elevator
rose to my floor, just as they stick
with their owners, the natives of Minneapolis,
most of whom know exactly where they are.

Alone in my room on the 17th floor,
I surveyed the vast prospect below me—
the slithery river and hills beyond
and the bluish hills beyond those hills—

in the manner of those English poets
who loved to regard the world from a height.
One of them even had a witty epitaph
inscribed upon the tombstone of his hound.
                                                                     -Billy Collins

Billy Collins's most recent book of poems is Water, Water.  Forthcoming is Dog Show, a collection of his dog poems with accompanying canine watercolor portraits. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters.

 

Billy Collins’s arresting “In Praise of Ignorance” begins with a revelation: “I realized what I liked best about the dogs of Minneapolis/ is they have no idea they are in Minneapolis.”

Animals are often said to be devoid of self-consciousness (not true) to live only in the moment (also not true), and/or not to experience duration when we leave and do not return for many hours (currently being disproven by research). In comparison to such metaphysics, Collins’ revelation seems ridiculously inconsequential. But is it?

Collins’ aperçu perhaps gets at the source of the bounce in a young dog’s walk—they simply travel, guided by a leash, unconstrained by geography. Unlike adult people, who remain aware of longitude, latitude, and the whole awkward contraption of distances, dogs are true cosmopolitans. They are anywhere and everywhere.

John Ashbery has said that he doesn’t think his thought operations are that different from anyone else’s. This assertion shows him capable of dramatizing thought in universal ways. Perhaps Collins does the same thing, though in a more direct manner. When he says, “I’m sticking with the dogs of Minneapolis,” he celebrates and satirizes human chauvinism, the basis of all fandom. And he supports his choice by likening it to the loyalty of dogs, who are, in a way, revealed here as models for living.

Like Ashbery’s, Collins’s poems often both celebrate and parody human thought processes. Here, in characterizing an idee fixe, Collins chooses graphic simplicity.

His poem has a Romantic peripatetic impetus—its recognition takes place outdoors, in nature, and continues as he strolls back to his hotel room. He compares himself to the Lake poets, humorously satirizing his own pretensions—a joke that becomes explicit in the poem’s last two stanzas. The same humor is evident in a short biopic made on Collins several years ago, after he was appointed Poet Laureate of the United States. A camera is trained on him as he pilots his car—he comments later that he was “afraid of looking like a bad driver.”

Collins’s description of the view from his 17th-floor window is both lyrically evocative and subtly satirical of Romantic endlessness--“the slithery river and the hills beyond / and the bluish hills beyond those hills. . .”—and of those “English poets/who loved to regard the world from a height.” “One of them,” he says, “even had a witty epitaph inscribed upon the tombstone of his hound.”

Collins’s ending is, of course, a sly reference to that most satirical of Romantic poets, George Gordon, Lord Byron. The internet tells us that “Epitaph to a Dog” was written in 1808 in honor of Byron’s Landseer dog, Boatswain. A tribute of some twenty-six lines of heroic couplets, it is inscribed on Boatswain’s monument (grander than Byron’s own in the same park), and includes the following sentiment:

 

     . . .the poor Dog, in life the firmest friend

     The first to welcome, foremost to defend

     Whose honest heart is still his master’s own

     Who labors, fights, breathes for him alone

     Unhonor’d falls, unnotic’d all his worth

     Deny’d in Heaven the Soul he held on earth*

 

Byron is reported to have nursed Boatswain to the end of his illness—rabies—with no thought of being bitten and infected.

That the poem ends by tacitly endorsing the grandeur of dogs in no way subtracts from its humor. It simply completes, in a surprising turn to human and canine history, the poem’s “praise of ignorance”—a praise both funny and solemn, consummately human and humane.

*The website The Classical Quill gives encomiums to dogs a classical pedigree, quoting the Greek teacher Hermongenes of Tarsus (fl. AD 550) on how to write encomia of animals.

Comments

[Annette C. Boehm]

Another lovely post, Angela!

[Sally Ashton]

woof! woof!
Thanks, Angela.

[Angela Ball]

Thank you for your kind comment, Annette.

Thank you for speaking in my love language, Sally.