How Reviewers at the NY Times treated Fitzgerald, Henry James, Virginia Woolf, et al

YThis is how reviewers at the NY Times treated certain books:

Scott Fitzgerald:
“Bad news is best blurted out at once: ‘Tender Is the Night’ is a disappointment. Though it displays Mr. Fitzgerald’s most engaging qualities, it makes his weaknesses appear ineradicable, for they are present in equal measure and in undiminished form. … His new book is clever and brilliantly surfaced, but it is not the work of a wise and mature novelist.” Reviewed by J. Donald Adams, April 15, 1934

Henry James:
“In ‘The Golden Bowl’ we find, standing for subtlety, a kind of restless finicking inquisitiveness, a flutter of aimless conjecture, such as might fall to a village spinster in a ‘department store.’ … How like ancient and tedious cronies the ‘wonderfullys’ and ‘preciselys’ and ‘adequatelys’ and ‘competentlys’ turn up on these pages — as a rule in places where no self-respecting adverb would choose to be discovered.” Reviewed by H.W. Boynton, Nov. 26, 19

Virginia Woolf, The Voyage Out:
“Aside from a certain cleverness — which, being all in one key, palls on one after going through a hundred pages of it — there is little in this offering to make it stand out from the ruck of mediocre novels which make far less literary pretension. As for the story itself, it is painfully lacking, both in coherency and narrative interest.” Unsigned, June 13, 1920

E. M. Forster, Howards End:
“As a social philosopher, evidently, Mr. Edward M. Forster has not yet arrived at any very positive convictions. … He evinces neither power nor inclination to come to grips with any vital human problem.” Unsigned, Feb. 19, 1911

Irving Berlin's score for Annie Get Your Gun: "Irving Berlin's latest score is routine composing.. . . The only theatrical achievement that you can be sure is basically American is the large, noisy, lavish, vulgar, commercial musical show, like 'Annie Get Your Gun,' with Ethel Merman blaring undistinguished tunes by Irving Berlin."-- Brooks Atkinson, 1946

If, on the other hand, you want to go against the grain in a big way, hire Vladimir Nabokov to take on Jean-Paul Sartre:

“Whether, from the viewpoint of literature, ‘La Nausée’ ['Nausea'] was worth translating at all is another question. It belongs to that tense-looking but really very loose type of writing, which has been popularized by many second-raters … Somewhere behind looms Dostoevsky at his worst.” Reviewed by Vladimir Nabokov, April 24, 1949

Comments

[Robert McDowell]

Reading the stuffy Fitzgerald comment brought to mind a young Mr. Lincoln eviscerating J. Palmer Cass for parting his name in the middle--('If it's all the same to you, I'll just call you Jack-Ass.'). Reviewers going by Unsigned are even worse. Petty, bitter, jealous, probaby in dire need of bowel movements, they embarrass the NYT & serious readers everywhere. Not that it mattered to the genius of Virginia Woolf, Forster, and others. Still, still...